connection with freedom: "To be independent of determination by causes in the sensible world...is to be free."
Implication: intentions matter
Two formulations of the Categorical Imperative (C.I.)
FUL (formula of universal law): "I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law."
Bare conformity to universal law
Examples: promising; deceit
Problem with FUL?
emptiness (allows universal killing)?
Response: C.I. requires the possibility of universal agreement, therefore rules out universal killing
FEI (formula of ends-in-themselves): "Act in such a way that you always treat humanity...never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end." The requirement of the possibility of universal agreement requires respecting people as ends-in-themselves
Justification of C.I.
freedom
teleological argument
Kant's political philosophy
Kant's separation of law and morality
ethical laws (internal, duty for duty's sake)
juridical laws (external, coercive)
Implications of distinction
one can be immoral (blameworthy) but not punishable
one can be punished but not immoral
Kant rejects c.
Kant's theory of punishment
Doctrine of right
Kant as natural law and natural rights theorist
What natural rights are there?
innate right to freedom
specific right to property
why property?
The source of rights and obligations
not utility
not consent (either explicit or implicit)
what of the general will?
The general will only confirms rights we already have provisionally
Kant's views on obligations and political identity
rights and obligations arise from the C.I.
We have an obligation to join a state
Obligations aren't to a specific people with whom we have special ties--Kant's cosmopolitanism